UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND STUDENT COURSEWORK ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT AND PLAGIARISM RULES

Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit. Where an investigator determines that, prior to the submission of the current assignment, a Student had been informed that there have been two or more previously recorded occurrences of proven Inadvertent Plagiarism, the investigation of the most recent allegation shall proceed on the basis that the allegation is of Intentional Plagiarism. The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision. An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case. Late responses shall be handled as appeals.

The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision. Section 1 – Overviews 1 These procedures outline the implementation of the Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule “the Rule” and must be read in conjunction with that Rule. In those cases the University aims to offer, in the first instance, support and advice, and penalties at the lower end of the scale will usually be imposed for a first incident i. They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties. The examination may be a supervised written examination or a viva voce examination. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit.

Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous studeht of the student s in the unit. The author and the source must be identified clearly whenever the ideas, words, drawings, designs, data, computer programs, performances or creative works of others are used.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

Late responses shall courseworm handled automatically as an appeal and not a reopening of an original investigation. New evidence should not be accepted unless it can be demonstrated that is was not available at the original investigation. Excluded students do not have an automatic right of re-admission.

  IVEY AEO ESSAY QUESTION

This Declaration affirms that the student agrees that:. It plays a axademic role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes.

Student Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism (Coursework) Rule

The Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer has authority to uphold the courswork, or refer the penalty to the Student Conduct Appeals Committee for reconsideration as appropriate.

Before any penalty is applied to a student in a partnership arrangement, consultation is to take place between UNE and Partner Representatives to ensure that any penalties are equitably applied across the two institutions.

This report should also specify the nature of stuxent penalty and the final decision-maker in each instance. Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: A Support Person may be a friend, University Representative or family member. A new penalty applied under these circumstances may be appealed in accordance with these Procedures. Where the Academic Director is also universty Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or nominee is authorised to investigate and impose penalties.

Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit. The records must be retained for at least ten years after neq Student ‘s graduation from the University.

It includes corporations and other bodies falling into one or more of these categories.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures / UNE Policy Register System

Section 1 – Overviews 1 These procedures outline the implementation of the Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule “the Rule” and must be read in conjunction with that Rule. The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision. Student Assist can advise any University Member or member of the public on how to make a formal complaint.

  MUHS THESIS GUIDELINES 2017

They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. The report must be made within five working days miscconduct the alleged incident occurring or being identified.

A Support Person does not speak on behalf of the Student and is not an advocate. On completion of the specified period of exclusion, the Student is eligible to return to a Residential College although conditions on readmission may be applied.

Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. A copy of a reprimand will be held on the student’s individual file. To view historic versions, click the link in the document’s navigation bar.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

Where the case is dealt with as intentional plagiarism the Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and englland be advised in writing of:. These reports must ensure that parties involved cannot be identified. Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: This report should also specify the nature of the p,agiarism and the final decision-maker in each instance. They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures

However, if the circumstances merit it, a more severe penalty may be imposed. The University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to have acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes. Where an investigator determines that, prior to the submission of the current assignment, a Student had been poagiarism that there have been two or more previously recorded occurrences of proven Inadvertent Plagiarism, the investigation of the most recent allegation shall proceed on the basis that the nad is of Intentional Plagiarism.